Please welcome Melissa Westemeier, who will tell us about her change of habit as she publishes the first in her Nun the Wiser series, Old Habits Die Hard:
Evolving from a Pantser to a Plotter
Like most novice writers, I wrote by the seat of my pants. While it was fun, the process was inevitably frustrating when I’d get caught up in a knotty plot or lose my focus or waste time developing a bunch of scenes that served no function or purpose in the final draft. I didn’t know any better. I thought writing was supposed to be creative. A writer should let inspiration strike, the characters should tell the story, lead with their heart. Sure, I’d start with a vague idea of how a story would go (It’s a story about a woman who starts selling home party products to make extra money and she falls in love with man of her dreams), but the journey from opening scene to final page was bumpy and full of detours because that’s the creative process, right?
Then I attended Patricia Skalka’s Bullet Point Plotting workshop at Untitled Town in Green Bay. The author of the Dave Cubiac Door County Mysteries taught how to outline a story and clarified “Pantsers” and “Plotters” for this novice writer. I was intrigued because I use lists to keep myself organized and focused in daily life and work, and as a high school teacher my annual writing season lasted less than three months, so if outlines and lists meant efficiency, I was all in! In 2019 I developed a bullet point outline for my next book, Through the Channel, and WOW! Plotting was a game-changer! I’d never written so efficiently in my life. I had an outline, a weekly word count goal and my characters’ motivations in all-caps on the first page so I’d see it every time I opened up the document. With these tools I was UNSTOPPABLE! My focus never wavered, and I completed a first draft in one summer.
In 2021 I visited my writing partner Mariana Damon, who wanted to work on a murder mystery, but her health made the project impossible. Our other writing partner, Marni Graff, and I helped Mariana develop notes on who killed who, how, and why. We filled out worksheets we’d brought to organize Mariana’s ideas for the characters, plot, and setting. As Marni and I prepared to return home, I mentioned how sad I felt. “She has a great idea, but she can’t write it.” As I spoke those words, I suddenly thought we should write it for her and get it published with her name on the cover. A year later I found myself between projects and ran across the few notes Marni and I pulled together over breakfast that day. How hard can it be to write a murder mystery? I got to work and 30,000 words later I came up for air. Mariana’s ideas of “who killed who, how and why” provided a road map and helped me flesh out an outline to guide the story from opening scene to resolution.
I couldn’t have written Old Habits Die Hard or any other mystery as a pantser. Mysteries require thoughtful plotting of events, the motives and red herrings need to make sense. Bernie and AJ’s investigation centers around logical questions and answers in solving the puzzle of Toni Travi’s death. As a reader, I despise wild leaps because they make me feel ripped off. I want a fair shot at solving a mystery, which means all the pieces need to land in the pages of a book. I know pantsers exist in the mystery writing community (I learned of one last fall which SHOCKED me—her books are so good! It amazes me how she pulls off pantsing). If I tried writing a mystery by the seat of my pants it would end up a huge, unsatisfying mess. Even using a plot outline provides freedom for inspiration to strike—I just don’t allow all that pantsing freedom to lead me down dead-end paths.
In Old Habits Die Hard, pantsing set up a scenario for Bernie to find an important clue so she could help AJ solve Toni’s murder. Not every tiny bit can get pre-planned (writing would feel boring if that were the case!) but without knowing who killed who, why, and how in advance this writer wouldn’t get past chapter five.
Melissa Westemeier is a Sister in Crime and teacher from Wisconsin. She uses humor to explore serious subjects, and her published books include murder mysteries, rom-coms, and a trilogy loosely based on her years tending bar on the Wolf River. She likes her coffee and protagonists strong and prefers to work barefoot with natural lighting.
You can find Melissa’s delightful book at:
Barnes & Noble: https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/old-habits-die-hard-melissa-westemeier/1146452143
Kobo: https://www.kobo.com/us/en/ebook/old-habits-die-hard-6

MIss Demeanors
Author
I seem to go back and forth on this. Plotting everything out feels like a job and makes me hate my life. Pantsing is full of trouble. I do something in between. An idea gets a pants treatment until I have a feel for it and the characters. Then a synopsis, which feels less an outline and more like telling the story. Then an outline. Then pantsing to the outline. Then a reoutline. And edit. That’s kind of where I ended up after practicing both extremes! Thank you for visiting and sharing your story, Melissa!
I totally feel you on how too much plotting can suck the fun and creativity out of writing fiction. The middle is good ground when it comes to writing because too much pantsing can feel exhausting, too!
I always start with the end. I want to know who’s murdered and why, and then I go back to the beginning now that I have a clothesline to hang everything else off of and that gives me a very loose framework of what I think may happen.
I guess that makes me like Emilya, combination of a pantser and a plotter. I don’t want to plot my entire book out as I want to allow for happenstance. Think we need our own name—plotpant? Sounds like something you grow a smoke!
Plotplant:) That’s awesome!
I think of myself as a plan-tser — half planner; half pantser. I start by sketching out four or five suspects who each have motive, means, and opportunity to kill the victim. I’d like to say I know which of the suspects is guilty from the start, but I’d be lying! Yes, it can be frustrating to have to go back into the story and plant new clues early on once I identify my villain. But I like the energy that comes with discovering my story as I write it.
That’s such a smart idea to flesh out the motive, means, and opportunity for multiple suspects at the start of a story! It would definitely keep things on track for maximum suspense!
Melissa, first, it was so nice to see you at Malice!
And I’m on Team Plotter but I give myself freedom to change my outline any time I want.
Welcome to the team!
Thanks, Lane! It was nice to meet you!
I’m still working on my plot/pants approach and I’d love to know more about the Bullet Point Plotting workshop.
Here’s an interview with Patricia Skalka that goes into some detail about her process. I checked Patricia’s website, but it doesn’t look like she’s got any conferences or workshops planned this year.
https://jeanleesworld.com/2021/08/15/authorinterview-wisconsin-mystery-writer-patricia-skalka-shares-setting-inspiration-and-tips-on-writing-a-unique-detective/
I start with an outline. Then I lose the outline somewhere around chapter three, when the plot takes a detour to parts unknown. I end up rewriting the plan to fit my book’s new pair of pants.
I’m laughing, Lori, because that is SO relatable to me! I’ve done that more than once, but it usually results in a stronger story, right?